Skip to main content

Stoicism summarised

Metaphilosophy

The Stoics were Aristotelian and Aristotle is certainly worth reading! In particular: understanding of nature and human telos, virtue ethics. Marcus shows the greatest influence of Aristotle in his writings.

Psychological techniques 

These are regular practices to help Stoics appreciate and make the most out of life.

Negative visualisation

Contemplating the impermanence of things

Contemplating the impermanence of things, including death, so that we can be more grateful for them in the present. Kind of like 'grace'. It may sound morbid at first, but it's really not when understood properly. Buddhists share this practice and are the happiest people on Earth.

Projecting your problems onto someone else

Under this category you could also put the practice of projecting your ills or fears onto others and analysing that projection objectively. You won't think the ill/fear is so bad as you've de-personalised it.

Locus of control

Recognising what's in your control and what's not

Perhaps the most famous Stoic doctrine. The quotes say it all:

Internalising value judgements


Interalising goals

Rather than 'external' goals and measures, which are dependent on others, use internal goals and measures instead.

Acceptance and love of fate

Fate is a difficult concept for Westerners to understand coherently and accept due to our cultural notion of free will. It's import to realise that fate is accepted by many non-Western cultures and Western societies of the past. Fate is not something mystical, but part of a scientific, determinist view of nature. If you don't believe in fate, I am unlikely to convince you that fate is a 'thing' here, but perhaps make you curious to learn more.

Accept the fate of past, but also the possibility of the future

Fatalistic in regard to the past and present (but not the future)

Amor fati

Love of fate. This was one of Nietzsche's favourite doctrines.

Practicising self-control/Tactical self-denial

This is all about enhancing self-control/willpower and actually learning to enjoy the absence of certain pleasures. A reminder that Stoicism is not Cynicism and certainly not sadomasochism. The denial of comfort and pleasure mentioned here are psychological techniques that enhance self-control and  result in greater appreciation of our comforts and protect us from hurt in their absence. Tactical self-denial is not an essential part of Stoicism, so don't feel obliged to take it on, especially if you're a novice. Most of this comes from Musonius Rufus.

Meditation

Much like other religions and self-help practices, meditation is very important, as we humans are programmed to forget.

Favourite quotes organised by topics


These quotes are my favourites. They may not be yours, and that's okay! Please share the ones you love.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Multiculturalism is responsible for every war in history (almost)

people informally segregate all the time. You will find various ethnic enclaves in Melbourne and Sydney. Ethnocentric in-group preference is also seen in choice of friends and communication levels among work colleagues of different ethnic backgrounds. While there may be enough tolerance to allow semi-deracinated individuals to participate in capitalism and consumerism, the reality is that in-group preference is innate and Multiculturalism/diversity should be avoided a much as possible, because it breaks down social cohesion and trust. Diversity is our greatest weakness - an observable, scientific reality (footnote: Robert Putnam). Remember that forced integration has lead to many conflicts in the 20th and 21st century. WWI and Hitler would not have happened if various ethnic groups had sovereignty rather than being under the thumb of oppressive empires. Iraq and Israel/Palestine are two current examples of Multicultural conflicts. There is widespread revolt against forced integrati...

How Liberalism enslaves

Aristotle, the Stoics and other ancient Greco-Roman moralists posit a very different idea of 'freedom' that involves combating the tendencies that divert us from human flourishing and contributing to our community as social animals. It is naturalistic, albeit pre-Darwinist, but it is not dogmatic like Liberalism, Leftism, etc. This ancient teach us what freedom really is, and Stoic practices in particular can inculcate an honest sense of autonomy. Liberalism claims to grant people autonomy but it only gives them a false sense of it. It effectively enslaves people to denial of their biology, hedonistic consumerism, keeping up with the Jones', seeking celebrity, lower quality social and family relations, workplace and other forms of alienation, pursuit of happiness in all the wrong places: career, travel, shiny things, sleeping around, taking drugs, etc. Liberalism won't necessarily lead to all these things, but it makes people vulnerable to their marketing, and being h...

Equality, Liberalism and the Big State

Shelley makes Liberalism sounds as idealistic and Utopian as any religion. I even see some parallels with the Sermon on the Mount. What is the relation between 'equality' and the 'individual'. (I don't think we are equal and my reification of the 'individual' has become weaker lately). Must one have a strong view of equality to have a strong view of the individual and their 'rights'? I think so, although those regimes pushing equality the strongest - the Communists - have ended up being the most hierarchical and totalitarian of all, with the State on top and the plebs below. Equality ends ups sacrificing individual 'rights' for the sake of whatever new set of individual 'rights' are trendy at the time. e.g. we need to pretend that homosexual relationships are equal to heterosexual ones therefore our 'free speech' right is sacrificed so as to protect the new 'freedom from hurt feelings' right of another. New indiv...