Skip to main content

MGTOW

tbh I don't know why these guys don't just convert to Islam: 4 obedient wives + 20 children + Centrelink benefits + don't need to work -- modern-day Genghis Khan!

but seriously, there's much reason for men in particular to be disenchanted with this feminised/gayised society

women can cope better as they more conciliatory generally and are benefiting from extra gibs and social status. however, as they grow older and become cat ladies, they grow increasingly resentful and channel their energies into lame left-wing, virtue-signalling causes as a substitute for a fulfilling role as a family matriarch and care-giver

the alpha chads are still doing well, because they can simply ignore all the feminine/gay stuff and the girls still want them

the more reflective/reserved lads are the ones doing it tough. I don't know much about MGTOW and don't care to know more. It is a scientific reality that we are made and driven to pass on our genes, so they should be trying to do that if they want a fulfilling life, rather than a life of resentment. Maybe they've had bad experiences with some or many women? So what...
- join a Church, pretend to believe in God, and find a nice, at least somewhat tradition girl, even if she isn't the prettiest
- or get a fat chick that will be grateful for any attention
- or become a sperm donor and have limited or no contact until the kids are grown up

No matter how you do it, you should be spreading your genes and aiming to leave a legacy in your community. Those two things are the meaning of life, lads. Not this resentful, nihilistic, MGTOW path.

Human beings are driven to reproduce and seek social status by being a patron/leader/care-giver to their community. These are scientific facts, not ideology like MGTOW.

MGTOW is a liberal response to a problem of Liberalism. It is not an act of independence or autonomy, but a denial of male nature and the refusal to flourish as a Patriarch. (Read Aristotle if you don't know where I'm coming from). You should be fighting against Liberalism, not perpetuating it in another way through MGTOW. There's a lot of male energy that could be harassed to push back on Liberalism and restore a more traditional, wholesome, patriarchal, noble society. Do that instead, even if you don't get far, it's still better than living a life of resentment.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Multiculturalism is responsible for every war in history (almost)

people informally segregate all the time. You will find various ethnic enclaves in Melbourne and Sydney. Ethnocentric in-group preference is also seen in choice of friends and communication levels among work colleagues of different ethnic backgrounds. While there may be enough tolerance to allow semi-deracinated individuals to participate in capitalism and consumerism, the reality is that in-group preference is innate and Multiculturalism/diversity should be avoided a much as possible, because it breaks down social cohesion and trust. Diversity is our greatest weakness - an observable, scientific reality (footnote: Robert Putnam). Remember that forced integration has lead to many conflicts in the 20th and 21st century. WWI and Hitler would not have happened if various ethnic groups had sovereignty rather than being under the thumb of oppressive empires. Iraq and Israel/Palestine are two current examples of Multicultural conflicts. There is widespread revolt against forced integrati...

How Liberalism enslaves

Aristotle, the Stoics and other ancient Greco-Roman moralists posit a very different idea of 'freedom' that involves combating the tendencies that divert us from human flourishing and contributing to our community as social animals. It is naturalistic, albeit pre-Darwinist, but it is not dogmatic like Liberalism, Leftism, etc. This ancient teach us what freedom really is, and Stoic practices in particular can inculcate an honest sense of autonomy. Liberalism claims to grant people autonomy but it only gives them a false sense of it. It effectively enslaves people to denial of their biology, hedonistic consumerism, keeping up with the Jones', seeking celebrity, lower quality social and family relations, workplace and other forms of alienation, pursuit of happiness in all the wrong places: career, travel, shiny things, sleeping around, taking drugs, etc. Liberalism won't necessarily lead to all these things, but it makes people vulnerable to their marketing, and being h...

Equality, Liberalism and the Big State

Shelley makes Liberalism sounds as idealistic and Utopian as any religion. I even see some parallels with the Sermon on the Mount. What is the relation between 'equality' and the 'individual'. (I don't think we are equal and my reification of the 'individual' has become weaker lately). Must one have a strong view of equality to have a strong view of the individual and their 'rights'? I think so, although those regimes pushing equality the strongest - the Communists - have ended up being the most hierarchical and totalitarian of all, with the State on top and the plebs below. Equality ends ups sacrificing individual 'rights' for the sake of whatever new set of individual 'rights' are trendy at the time. e.g. we need to pretend that homosexual relationships are equal to heterosexual ones therefore our 'free speech' right is sacrificed so as to protect the new 'freedom from hurt feelings' right of another. New indiv...