Skip to main content

To Christians

Your faith has made you weak and you sure af aren't inheriting the earth, you're helping to throw it away.

Go read or watch a few YT vids about Kierkegaard, a Christian, then we can have a good conversation about different lifestyles (hedonistic vs ethical vs Christian life of faith). From reading him I hope you find that Christianity cannot be justified by argument/reason/logic/apologetics. It requires a leap of faith, because the Christian worldview is absurd.

Christianity makes no sense within an Enlightenment logical/scientific worldview -- which is not to say such a worldview is the limit of human experience, far from it. The mystery of God, unknown except though faith, was lost during the Enlightenment. The attempt to rationalise Christianity within a scientific framework effectively made God an idol of human intellectual agency. That idol was smashed and led to the nihilism that many people still suffer today. The Brother Karamazov tells of this, as does Nietzsche and Kierkegaard.

I don't recommend a life of Christian faith, because only a very small number of remarkable individuals can live it sincerely (e.g. Abraham, Moses, etc.). Many more can live an ethical life while being nominally Christian. I much prefer nominal Christians to secular humanists, as the latter are far more dogmatic, hypocritical and virtue-signally nowadays. Most secular humanists don't see how their beliefs grew out of Christianity and so their assertions about equality and so forth are dogmatic.

I'd like to do away Christian dogma altogether, because I think most modern-day Christianity is still prone to nihilism, toward becoming a form of stale hypocrisy. It has also become captive to political correctness and lacks the will and sense of righteousness to assert itself and impose morality on others.

Secular Humanism has been overrun by Cultural Marxism/PC and is driven by resentment. It's for bug man and cat ladies who want to consume and virtue-signal while not caring about anything but their personal comfort.

The buzzwordy 'third way' I advocate is through the virtue ethics of Aristotle and the Stoics. I think this rediscoovered morality is just what we in the West need if our civilization is going to MAGA the world again.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Multiculturalism is responsible for every war in history (almost)

people informally segregate all the time. You will find various ethnic enclaves in Melbourne and Sydney. Ethnocentric in-group preference is also seen in choice of friends and communication levels among work colleagues of different ethnic backgrounds. While there may be enough tolerance to allow semi-deracinated individuals to participate in capitalism and consumerism, the reality is that in-group preference is innate and Multiculturalism/diversity should be avoided a much as possible, because it breaks down social cohesion and trust. Diversity is our greatest weakness - an observable, scientific reality (footnote: Robert Putnam). Remember that forced integration has lead to many conflicts in the 20th and 21st century. WWI and Hitler would not have happened if various ethnic groups had sovereignty rather than being under the thumb of oppressive empires. Iraq and Israel/Palestine are two current examples of Multicultural conflicts. There is widespread revolt against forced integrati...

How Liberalism enslaves

Aristotle, the Stoics and other ancient Greco-Roman moralists posit a very different idea of 'freedom' that involves combating the tendencies that divert us from human flourishing and contributing to our community as social animals. It is naturalistic, albeit pre-Darwinist, but it is not dogmatic like Liberalism, Leftism, etc. This ancient teach us what freedom really is, and Stoic practices in particular can inculcate an honest sense of autonomy. Liberalism claims to grant people autonomy but it only gives them a false sense of it. It effectively enslaves people to denial of their biology, hedonistic consumerism, keeping up with the Jones', seeking celebrity, lower quality social and family relations, workplace and other forms of alienation, pursuit of happiness in all the wrong places: career, travel, shiny things, sleeping around, taking drugs, etc. Liberalism won't necessarily lead to all these things, but it makes people vulnerable to their marketing, and being h...

Equality, Liberalism and the Big State

Shelley makes Liberalism sounds as idealistic and Utopian as any religion. I even see some parallels with the Sermon on the Mount. What is the relation between 'equality' and the 'individual'. (I don't think we are equal and my reification of the 'individual' has become weaker lately). Must one have a strong view of equality to have a strong view of the individual and their 'rights'? I think so, although those regimes pushing equality the strongest - the Communists - have ended up being the most hierarchical and totalitarian of all, with the State on top and the plebs below. Equality ends ups sacrificing individual 'rights' for the sake of whatever new set of individual 'rights' are trendy at the time. e.g. we need to pretend that homosexual relationships are equal to heterosexual ones therefore our 'free speech' right is sacrificed so as to protect the new 'freedom from hurt feelings' right of another. New indiv...