I dislike Libertarians because they're politics are negative (in a philosophical sense) and as unrealistic and Utopian as any socialist. They are often obsessed with minor issues like vaping, and miss the big picture issues like immigration. They are cult-like in their worship of Hayek, Mises, etc.
I've been trolling Catallaxy for a couple of months, very irregularly - perhaps five posts in total.
My latest troll:
The more I thought about my troll the more I realised it was true! Not that Libertarians are actual cucks (though that would certainly be permitted under their morality), but that Libertarianism does concede defeat to the Left in its framing of issues. Let me explain:
The Libertarian wants to be free. But free from what? Answer: The Left and its totalitarianism through the state. Immediately Libertards have framed their politics in terms of the Left. They accepts the Left's framing, much of their terminology and many of their assumptions without thinking.
The Libertard likes to pretend they pursue their politics based on some objective, intellectual foundations, but that's just B.S. Just look at what they talk about 80% of the time. It's all in opposition to the Left - trying to concede as little ground as possible, not promoting something new, positive and realistic of their own.
Libertards have cucked on the debate/framing, but now all they ask is to be left alone. This is slave morality.
A follow up troll:
I've been trolling Catallaxy for a couple of months, very irregularly - perhaps five posts in total.
My latest troll:
white supremacists exist in the mind of libertards who want to virtue-signal while cucking for the Left’s framing of their opponents as such. basically: libertardianism = cuckoldry. discuss.The context is not really important, as I am just trolling for a reaction, but if you want to read the thread in full: David Leyonhjelm. Don’t let the terrorists and supremacists win
The more I thought about my troll the more I realised it was true! Not that Libertarians are actual cucks (though that would certainly be permitted under their morality), but that Libertarianism does concede defeat to the Left in its framing of issues. Let me explain:
The Libertarian wants to be free. But free from what? Answer: The Left and its totalitarianism through the state. Immediately Libertards have framed their politics in terms of the Left. They accepts the Left's framing, much of their terminology and many of their assumptions without thinking.
The Libertard likes to pretend they pursue their politics based on some objective, intellectual foundations, but that's just B.S. Just look at what they talk about 80% of the time. It's all in opposition to the Left - trying to concede as little ground as possible, not promoting something new, positive and realistic of their own.
Libertards have cucked on the debate/framing, but now all they ask is to be left alone. This is slave morality.
A follow up troll:
further, the libertard is beholden to slave morality in his pursuit of liberty.
this pursuit is negative though; he does not seek the good, rather freedom from constraint. like a slave, he has no virtue of his own to pursue. he is but a gimp yearning to be free.
Comments
Post a Comment