- he's was an escapist - worse than most he criticises for the same. like an ascetic, he threw himself into his writing to escape the world.
- his personal life was pathetic, but he tries to boost his ego by transforming himself into an intellectual legend and shitting on others. he was full of resentment!
- he fails to see his aesthetic imaginations and emotions generally as escape behaviour (interestingly, Sartre doesn't make the same mistake).
- his enthusiasm is not convincing at all.
- he was a loser.
- but being a loser, he also knew what losers were like, so his critique is insightful.
How a post-war population explosion put an end to Sydney's 'visionary' Green Belt plan
Comments
Post a Comment