http://catallaxyfiles.com/2018/12/14/identity-politics-is-reactionary/comment-page-1/#comment-2886030
In-group preference is a scientific reality. It is not a moral defect AKA "racism". If you think it is a defect you have been brainwashed. To say that 'identity politics' (pejorative for in-group preference) is reactionary, even though everyone has been doing it for the entirety of history, is retarded. Libertarians are retarded.
People who complain about 'identity politics' are always white or echoing whites. A smart person would question why that is, but not a Libertarian - because they are retarded.
Whites restraining their natural in-group preference is not working out for them. Other ethnic groups are pursuing their in-group preference and it is benefiting them. Two solutions:
1. whites embrace ethnocentrism (like for all of human history, except the last 50 years)
2. undermine ethnocentricism in non-whites and broader society. e.g. by labeling it pejoratively 'identity politics'; marking it as low-status/outsider/evil.
Whites have pursued the second option since at least the 60s, despite its continued failure. They do this is because it is politically correct and despite claiming to be 'individuals' they fear being marked as low-status among the herd.
Libertarians would rather have their freedom of speech and association be taken away than be called 'racist'. They implicitly support the big state social engineering project of Multiculturalism because they don't support its alternative.
btw, the people who beat the Nazis were 'racists' and in Australia's case white nationalist. You should thank white racists for all the freedoms you enjoy, and blame white 'anti-racists' for all the freedoms you are losing.
Comments
Post a Comment